Fluoridation in Canada as of December 31, 1972
Read Online
Share

Fluoridation in Canada as of December 31, 1972 a report prepared for the Community Health Directorate, Health Programs Branch, Department of National Health and Welfare, Canada. by Canadian Dental Association.

  • 262 Want to read
  • ·
  • 36 Currently reading

Published by Health and Welfare Canada in [Toronto] .
Written in English


Book details:

Edition Notes

ContributionsCanada. Department of National Health and Welfare. Health Programs Branch.
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL19762692M

Download Fluoridation in Canada as of December 31, 1972

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

Fluoridation is a bad medical practice. 1) Fluoride is the only chemical added to water for the purpose of medical U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies fluoride as a drug when used to prevent or mitigate disease (FDA ). As a matter of basic logic, adding fluoride to water for the sole purpose of preventing tooth decay (a non-waterborne disease) is . His most recent book "Fluoridation: The Great Dilemma", , in collaboration with professors A.W. Burgstahler and H.L. McKinney is the most encompassing presentation available on this subject. His studies on fluoride include the administration of test doses of fluoride to allergic and non-allergic individuals and to those suspected of being. Only one year after this WHO-monograph was published, in water fluoridation in Sweden was stopped and forbidden after an open hard discussion between the Swedish dentist and WHO scientific-advisor Prof. Yngve Ericsson and the Swedish pharmacologist and toxicologist Prof. Arvid Carlsson; and in Germany water fluoridation was stopped on A letter from the Environmental Protection Agency, dated Ma , announced, “The EPA, in addition to its pollution abatement activities, supports and promotes the fluoridation of public water supplies through its water supply program this practice has been and is being thoroughly researched and safety is our prime.

  The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and its parent agency, Health and Human Services, consider fluoride concentrations in water of parts per million, or ppm, the sweet spot – a level high enough to prevent tooth decay but low enough to avoid mild dental fluorosis or more serious problems.   In a report by the ADA, it is stated that dentists make 17% more profit in fluoridated areas as opposed to non-fluoridated areas (Douglas et al., “Impact of water fluoridation on dental practices and dental manpower”, Journal of the American Dental Association; , ).   These deletions were the immediate result of Court deliberations. 31 No essential function for fluoride has ever been proven in humans. 32,33,34,35,36 “Nature Thought of It First” A popular slogan employed by the ADA and other pro-fluoridation organizations is, “Nature thought of it first!”.   Fluoridation: My podcast with with Howard Farran. Posted on Ma | 32 Comments. This is a bit embarrassing. “Patterns of dental caries following the cessation of water fluoridation” [Canada] “The prevalence of caries (assessed in 5, children, grades 2, 3, 8, 9) decreased over time in the fluoridation-ended community while.

[22] the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, [28] and the national dental associations of Australia, [29] Canada, [30] and the U.S. [31] The American Dental Association calls water fluoridation "one of the safest and most beneficial, cost-effective public health measures for preventing, controlling, and in some cases reversing, tooth decay.". The water fluoridation controversy arises from moral, ethical, and safety concerns regarding the fluoridation of public water controversy occurs mainly in English-speaking countries, as Continental Europe does not practice water fluoridation. [1] Instead, fluoride is added to most table salt in Europe. [2] Those opposed argue that water fluoridation imposes ethical issues, . Actually, it’s what his father, Dr. James S. Beck, who wrote the post and who has co-authored a book with well-known anti-fluoridation crank Paul Connett, the driving force behind the Fluoride Action Network entitled The Case Against Fluoride: How Hazardous Waste Ended Up in Our Drinking Water and the Bad Science and Powerful Politics That. We conducted a prospective study of a general population sample of those born in Dunedin, New Zealand, between April 1, , and Ma (% retention of .